2026 Excellence in Biocuration Advanced Career Award Recipient

Congratulations to Steven Marygold this year’s Excellence in Biocuration Advanced Career award recipient!

Steven has been group manager, curator and nomenclature advisor at FlyBase (flybase.org) for 20 years. During this time, he has made sustained, wide-ranging contributions to biocuration within FlyBase and the wider community in areas ranging from genetic, functional and disease model annotation, to bibliography management and ontology development. His work is described in over 40 publications.

Steven conceived the FlyBase Gene Group resource, which provides expert-curated, logically organised and systematically named gene family data for Drosophila melanogaster. This included a multi-year enzyme annotation project to review and validate GO/EC annotations for ~3,800 enzyme-encoding genes (26% of the proteome), detailed in two dedicated publications. That work led to the generation of FlyCyc, which provides a computed model of Drosophila metabolism, and an ongoing project to manually curate fly metabolic pathways as GO causal activity models (GO-CAMs). Steven also catalogued all ~4,000 ncRNA genes of Drosophila and coordinated their submission to RNAcentral, further demonstrating his cover-all approach to reviewing diverse, previously under-annotated gene classes. Steven is a major contributor to the Gene Ontology, identifying and reporting errors in catalytic and metabolic terms/annotations that propagate to dozens of downstream resources, and is actively involved in ontology development as a GO editor. He collaborates with Rhea, BioCyc, Reactome, RNACentral, UniProt, HGNC and the Alliance of Genome Resources, amplifying the reach of his curation well beyond FlyBase. Steven is also coordinating the establishment of a FlyBase subscription model to cover the loss of US federal funding to the UK site.

Steven’s career is a model of how rigorous, sustained expert biocuration impacts across the bioinformatics and research communities, building lasting community-wide infrastructure.


Publications

  • Garapati PV, Zaru R, Attrill H, dos Santos G, Goodman J, Thurmond J, Marygold SJ. (2026) Comprehensive annotation of the enzymes of Drosophila melanogaster. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 16(2):jkaf294 DOI:10.1093/g3journal/jkaf294
  • Marygold SJ. (2025) FlyCyc: a Pathway/Genome Database for the model organism Drosophila melanogasterhttps://biocyc.org/organism-summary?object=DMEL
  • Öztürk-Çolak A, Marygold SJ, Antonazzo G, Attrill H, Goutte-Gattat D, Jenkins VK, Matthews BB, Millburn G, dos Santos G, Tabone CJ, FlyBase Consortium. (2024) FlyBase: updates to the Drosophila genes and genomes database. Genetics 227(1):iyad211. DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyad211
  • Marygold SJ, Chan PP, Lowe TM. (2022) Systematic identification of tRNA genes in Drosophila melanogaster. microPublication Biology 000560. DOI:10.17912/micropub.biology.000560
  • Attrill H, Falls K, Goodman JL, Millburn GH, Antonazzo G, Rey AJ, Marygold SJ, FlyBase Consortium. (2016) FlyBase: establishing a Gene Group resource for Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Research 44(D1):D786–D792. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkv1046

ORCID: 0000-0003-2759-266X

2026 Excellence in Biocuration Early Career Award Recipient

Congratulations to Pascal Carme this year’s Excellence in Biocuration Early Career award recipient!

Pascal Carme has been a curator at PomBase for only just over 2 years, but he has quickly established himself as a critical member of the PomBase team. Since joining, he has taken on a substantial share of the community curation review workload, and is now the primary developer of the fission yeast phenotype ontology (FYPO). He is a major contributor to our GO-CAM modelling projects, having created or contributed to more than 50 pathway models. He has also supervised undergraduate students at UCL on GO-CAM modelling projects. He is responsible for the technical review of PomBase micropublications. He also manages the hosting of sequence-based datasets in JBrowse. Pascal has developed a series of outreach seminars, “Just One Thing”, presented through the Pombe Talks seminar series. These sessions highlight specific PomBase features and help users make more effective use of the resource, covering topics such as ontologies, GO-CAMs, and search functionality. He was the lead author of the recent PomBase resource update in Genetics journal.


Publications:

  • PomBase in 2026: expanding knowledge, modelling connections. PMID: 41518600

ORCID: 0009-0003-9059-1333

Nominees for Excellence in Biocuration Early and Advanced Career Awards

The nominees for this year’s are in! Congratulations to all the nominees.

Voting will be open from June 1 – June 12. Only active members are eligible to vote. If you have not renewed your membership, please do so before June 1st. Active members should receive an email with their individual ballot link. The email will be sent to the address associated with your ISB account. If you become a member during the voting period, please reach out to us to receive a ballot.


The nominees for the Excellence in Biocuration Early Career Award are:

  • Pascal Carme, University of Cambridge
  • Kathiyayini Jayaraman, Kriyadocs, Olympia Cyberspace, Guindy, Chennai, India
  • Nancy Ontiveros-Palacios, EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK

Detailed descriptions here


The nominees for the Excellence in Biocuration Advanced Career Award are:

  • Shailesh Kumar, BRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research, India
  • Antonina Andreeva, EMBL-EBI, UK
  • Steven Marygold, University of Cambridge, UK
  • Bastian Fromm, The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
  • Sabrina Toro, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
  • Parul Gupta, Oregon State University, USA
  • Scott V Nguyen, American Type Culture Collection, USA

Detailed descriptions here


Biocuration Awards Nominations Open April 20th

Time to start thinking about nominating your friendly neighborhood biocurator (or yourself) for the ISB Biocuration Career Awards! This year we are awarding the Excellence in Biocuration Early and Advanced Career Awards. The awards come with a monetary prize and a speaking slot at the ISB annual general meeting held virtually in late October.


Nominations will be open April 20th, 2026 and will close on May 15th, 2026


Please see the Biocuration Awards page for details.

Biocuration Awards Nominations Open Soon!

Time to start thinking about nominating your friendly neighborhood biocurator (or yourself) for the ISB Biocuration Career Awards! This year we are awarding the Excellence in Biocuration Early and Advanced Career Awards. The awards come with a monetary prize and a speaking slot at the ISB annual general meeting held virtually in late October.


Nominations will officially open in mid-April and will be open for 1 month.


Please see the Biocuration Awards page for details.

Biocuration Insights: UniProt

Biocurators organize biological literature and data into reusable databases and resources that enable researchers to build on past findings, compare results across studies and species, and focus their time on critical scientific questions and drive new research. In many ways, biocurators are the unsung heroes of scientific progress. Therefore, we’re kicking off a series to highlight these efforts.

Our first highlighted resource in this series is the Universal Protein Resource, better known as UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org).

UniProt is a global, freely accessible protein knowledge resource that underpins research across biology, medicine, and biotechnology by combining expert curation, computational methods, and community input to deliver accurate, current, and usable protein information. These biocuration efforts transform large-scale protein data into reliable biological knowledge by carefully selecting high-quality reference proteomes, rigorously extracting experimental evidence from the literature, and structuring representation using interoperable vocabularies and ontologies. UniProt maintains its strong focus on usability—through intuitive search, navigation, and integrated analysis tools—allow researchers to move seamlessly between curated knowledge and methods such as sequence searches, alignments, peptide analysis, and identifier mapping. By integrating community contributions and machine-learning–assisted workflows under expert oversight, this work highlights biocuration as a collaborative, evolving practice essential for understanding biology at scale.

The first paper we’re highlighting is UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025 – it provides a foundational infrastructure update—high relevance to ISB community:

  • Core Biocuration Contribution: systematic overhaul of UniProt pipelines, limiting to high‑quality reference proteomes; combines expert annotation, ORCID‑tracked community submissions, and machine‑learning frameworks (UniRule, ProtNLM) to expand functional data and QC.
  • Key Methods:
    • BUSCO‑driven QC & reference‑proteome selection
    • Expanded UniRule & PANTHER rule sets; LLM‑based ProtNLM function naming
    • New Genomics tab linking proteins to genome coordinates
    • Community curation via ORCID submissions
  • Resources Resused: UniProtKB/Swiss‑Prot, UniProtKB/TrEMBL, UniParc, UniRef, Gene Ontology, ChEBI, Rhea, GO‑CAM, InterPro, ProtVista, Complex Portal
  • Impact/Applications: provides a trusted, FAIR backbone for AI/omics research, drug discovery and database interoperability; recognised as a Global Core Biodata Resource.
  • Strengths: Combines expert & ML curation; robust QC; large‑scale reach.
  • Caveats/Limitations: ML predictions need curator validation; initial drop in TrEMBL size.

The second paper we want to highlight is The UniProt Consortium. Searching and navigating UniProt databases (2023):

  • Core Biocuration Contribution: Peer‑reviewed tutorial standardising discovery of curated UniProt knowledge; boosts accessibility and reproducibility.
  • Key Methods:
    • Basic & advanced search protocols with Boolean logic and field filters
    • Demonstrates integration with analysis tools
    • Emphasises FAIR API endpoints and query syntax
  • Resources Reused: UniProtKB, UniRef, UniParc, Proteomes dataset selector, BLAST, Align, ID‑Mapping, REST & SPARQL APIs
  • Impact/Applications: empowers users to retrieve accurate annotations, enabling reproducible data mining and training
  • Strengths: Clear, screenshot‑rich, modular; open access.
  • Caveat/Limitations: Instructional—no new biological data; UI changes may date examples.

We hope you enjoyed this quick-and-dirty summary of two recent papers. Want ISB to highlight your work? Check out this form.

Amos Bairoch, a biocurator at heart, passes away

It is with great sadness that we learned the passing of Prof. Amos Bairoch on November 29th, 2025. Amos was a deeply valued and admired colleague, as well as a cherished friend to many within the biocuration community. His remarkable blend of enthusiasm, intellect, energy, creativity, humor, and rigor fueled the numerous initiatives he led. His unwavering work ethic consistently resulted in work of exceptional quality.

Amos can be considered the original professional biocurator, even though he came about it in an accidental way – as all great breakthroughs. During his Ph.D. at the University of Geneva, Switzerland, he was taken off the bench path due to a faulty mass spectrometer in the early 1980s. While waiting for the machine to be repaired, he started to work on a software package (PC/Gene) to analyze protein sequences. The software relied on the Protein Identification Resource (PIR) of the National Biomedical Research Foundation (NBRF), that had been developed by Margaret Dayhoff starting in 1965. This set the scene for Swiss-Prot to emerge in 1986 as Amos had broadened Dayhoff’s protein curation to produce a structured on-line resource. Protein annotation needed to abide by rules and Amos set out to state those rules, share them with other biocurators thereby initiating standards.

Many years before the development of biomedical ontologies, Amos spearheaded the development of controlled vocabularies and was aware of the need to channel those efforts within the life science community. He co-founded the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) in 1998 with Ron Appel, who had launched Expasy, one of the first web servers for molecular biology, at the time tailor-made to hosting Swiss-Prot.

Amos’ major input to biocuration was praised all throughout. He was recognized with an Exceptional contribution to ISB award in 2021. Ten years earlier, his contribution to the expansion of proteomics was crowned by the HUPO Distinguished Achievement Award in Proteomic Sciences (2011). As recently as 2025, the International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) acknowledged his commitment with a Senior Scientist Accomplishment award. Importantly for the biocuration community, the seed of ISB was planted in many minds and, with his impulse, it was established in Switzerland in 2009.

Amos was a relentless biocurator and probably one of the most productive in the array of curated databases. Whoever has seen him sitting in meetings will always remember his eyes and fingers stuck on a laptop and whether he was gathering information on proteins for Swiss-Prot (1986-2009), neXtprot (2009-2022), or cell lines for Cellosaurus (2014-2025), it remained an obsessive task for him. Yet, as soon as he raised his head from his laptop, he would be keen to discuss and share on the latest cool information he found or on any topic anyone would bring about.

We say goodbye to a great scientist, colleague, and friend, but his legacy will continue to inspire.

ISB AGM Recording

Thanks to all who attended this year’s Annual General Meeting. Congratulations again to our Early and Advance Career Award Winners, Tiago Lubiana and Kimberly Van Auken! You can find their excellent talks at around the half way point of the recording of the meeting.

The meeting recording is up on the ISB YouTube channel if you missed the meeting.

Executive Committee Election Results

The results for the 2025 EC elections are in!


We had five outstanding candidates:

  • TBK Reddy
  • Kalpana Panneerselvam
  • Susan Bello
  • Ranjana Kishore
  • Sumir Pandit

Out of 176 eligible voters, we had 80 ballots returned. The vote totals for each candidate were:

  • Susan Bello – 69 (31%)
  • Kalpana Panneerselvam – 53 (24%)
  • Ranjana Kishore – 46 (21%)
  • TBK Reddy – 38 (17%)
  • Sumir Pandit – 15 (7%)

The three candidates with the most votes all accepted the positions on the EC.


Thank you to all the candidates for agreeing to run. Thank you to all who voted. We look forward to a productive year.

Search by Categories